| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision |
| aker:books_and_literature:atom_and_archetype [2014/02/16 21:51] – janus | books_and_literature:atom_and_archetype [2017/02/14 04:18] – ↷ Page moved from aker:books_and_literature:atom_and_archetype to books_and_literature:atom_and_archetype janus |
|---|
| |
| <fc green>p84 - p133 I found letters 58P to 67J to be most interesting. Here J. and Pauli talk about the language of the psyche, numbers, complimentarily, symmetry, the border between psyche and matter and the relationship between spirit, psyche and matter. They talk of the 'third thing' that can understand the two. The difficulty with going from three to four, and so much more. Letter 76P and 77J are good to in discussing symmetry and UFO's.</fc> | <fc green>p84 - p133 I found letters 58P to 67J to be most interesting. Here J. and Pauli talk about the language of the psyche, numbers, complimentarily, symmetry, the border between psyche and matter and the relationship between spirit, psyche and matter. They talk of the 'third thing' that can understand the two. The difficulty with going from three to four, and so much more. Letter 76P and 77J are good to in discussing symmetry and UFO's.</fc> |
| | |
| | p99 "//"Ars totum requirit hominem!"// <fc green>[“The art requires the whole person.”]</fc> For only from **his** wholeness can man create a model of the whole." <fc green>(emphasis mine)</fc> |
| |
| p126 "Psyched and matter, as a **"matrix,"** are both an X - i.e., a transcendental unknown quantity and thus indistinguishable in conceptual terms, which makes them //virtually identical//; only on a secondary level are they different, as different aspects of Being.\\ Amon the things that are part of the substance of the psychic are //psychoid archetypes//. The characteristic that is peculiar to the archetype is that it manifests itself not only psychically-subjectively but also physically-objectively; in other words, it is possible that it can be proved to be both psychic inner occurrence and also a physical external one. I regard this phenomenon as an indication of the fact that the physical and psychic matrix is identical." <fc green>(emphasis mine)</fc> | p126 "Psyched and matter, as a **"matrix,"** are both an X - i.e., a transcendental unknown quantity and thus indistinguishable in conceptual terms, which makes them //virtually identical//; only on a secondary level are they different, as different aspects of Being.\\ Amon the things that are part of the substance of the psychic are //psychoid archetypes//. The characteristic that is peculiar to the archetype is that it manifests itself not only psychically-subjectively but also physically-objectively; in other words, it is possible that it can be proved to be both psychic inner occurrence and also a physical external one. I regard this phenomenon as an indication of the fact that the physical and psychic matrix is identical." <fc green>(emphasis mine)</fc> |
| | |
| | p127 "In consequence of the indispensability of the psychic processes, there cannot be just //one// way of access to the secret of Being; there must be at least //two// - namely, the material occurrence on the one hand and the psychic reflection of it on the other (although it will be hard to determine what is reflecting what!).\\ Given these circumstances, the task facing these two disciplines is to locate and describe that region which is indisputably common to both. My dreams and my intuition have both referred me to natural numbers. ...\\ I therefore believe that from the psychological point of view at least, the sought-after borderland between physics and psychology lies in the secret of the number. Hence the saying, fittingly enough, that man made mathematics but God made the whole numbers.<sup><fc red>a</fc></sup>" |
| | |
| | p128 "Any classification of psychology into a general theoretical form of physics, as has happened with chemistry, is out of the question in my opinion, because of the fact that psychic processes cannot be measured, ..." |
| | |
| | p129 "Oddly enough, the problem is still the same 2,000-year-old one: How does one get from Three to Four?" |