Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
aker:collected_works:cw8 [2015/10/01 23:40] janusaker:collected_works:cw8 [2015/10/15 01:23] janus
Line 119: Line 119:
 <fc green>Note Jung's example with numbers.  I like it when he uses numbers to illustrate or show an analogy of the concept.\\ RE soul, it seems the reason Jung uses the concept of soul here is in keeping with the previous discussions of philosophy and the hitherto attitude of 'knowing' all that there is to know about the soul.  Only now, as a concept if we acknowledge the psychological implications of an unconscious...then we can no longer believe we know everything there is to know, i.e., what is conscious.</fc> <fc green>Note Jung's example with numbers.  I like it when he uses numbers to illustrate or show an analogy of the concept.\\ RE soul, it seems the reason Jung uses the concept of soul here is in keeping with the previous discussions of philosophy and the hitherto attitude of 'knowing' all that there is to know about the soul.  Only now, as a concept if we acknowledge the psychological implications of an unconscious...then we can no longer believe we know everything there is to know, i.e., what is conscious.</fc>
  
-§357 "All the same, every science is a function of the psyche, and all knowledge is rooted in it. The psyche is the greatest of all cosmic wonders and the //sine qua non// of the world as an object.<fc green>(i.e., the world would not exist as on object if the psyche wasn't there to observer it, to make it conscious.  I think? [[janus@deprofundis.co.uk|comments welcome]])</fc>. ... Swamped by the knowledge of external objects, the subject of all knowledge has been temporarily eclipsed to the point of seeming non-existence."+§357 "All the same, every science is a function of the psyche, and all knowledge is rooted in it. The psyche is the greatest of all cosmic wonders and the //sine qua non// of the world as an object.<fc green>(i.e., the world would not exist as on object if the psyche wasn't there to observer it, to make it conscious.  I think? [[janus@deprofundis.co|comments welcome]])</fc>. ... Swamped by the knowledge of external objects, the subject of all knowledge has been temporarily eclipsed to the point of seeming non-existence."
  
 §358 "...if the subject of knowledge, the psyche, were in fact a veiled form of existence not immediately accessible to consciousness, then all our knowledge must be incomplete, ... " §358 "...if the subject of knowledge, the psyche, were in fact a veiled form of existence not immediately accessible to consciousness, then all our knowledge must be incomplete, ... "
  • Last modified: 2017/02/14 05:08
  • by janus