| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |
| space_and_time [2017/02/14 04:21] – ↷ Page moved from aker:space_and_time to space_and_time janus | space_and_time [2017/02/14 05:08] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation janus |
|---|
| |
| A model of perception and apperception\\ | A model of perception and apperception\\ |
| {{:aker:time_and_space:consciousness.png?800|}}\\ | {{time_and_space:consciousness.png?800|}}\\ |
| This model is not considered at the quantum level. | This model is not considered at the quantum level. |
| | Showing where **no** time exists. | Showing where there **is** time and space | | | Showing where **no** time exists. | Showing where there **is** time and space | |
| | {{:aker:time_and_space:consciousness_t.png?380|}} | {{:aker:time_and_space:consciousness_nt.png?380|}} | | | {{time_and_space:consciousness_t.png?380|}} | {{time_and_space:consciousness_nt.png?380|}} | |
| |
| <fc red>t<sub>0</sub></fc> = An event or object in space and time. This object or event is there, it happens. In this example, a tree.\\ | <fc red>t<sub>0</sub></fc> = An event or object in space and time. This object or event is there, it happens. In this example, a tree.\\ |
| <fc red>t<sub>4</sub></fc> = <fc red>t<sub>3</sub></fc> is the point at which the tree as an engram exists in the brain. It would be reasonable to assume <fc red>t<sub>4</sub></fc> is equal to <fc red>t<sub>3</sub></fc> were it not for the fact that consciousness of the tree is different to the engram of the tree in the brain. Moreover as I mention later, the object may already exist in consciousness without having been seen and placed as an engram into the brain. In this example it is a tree but it could be anything. \\ That said there is another objection to <fc red>t<sub>3</sub></fc> and <fc red>t<sub>4</sub></fc> being separate times: <fc red>t<sub>4</sub></fc> exists where there is no time. The coming to consciousness of the tree object occurs in a non-time place, the place of psyche and consciousness. This raises questions about the limitations of the psyche to bring objects to consciousness. I do not know those questions and I think it has something to do with the border between psyche and matter. Perhaps <fc red>t<sub>4</sub></fc> is not a time marker but the event of the tree coming into consciousness. | <fc red>t<sub>4</sub></fc> = <fc red>t<sub>3</sub></fc> is the point at which the tree as an engram exists in the brain. It would be reasonable to assume <fc red>t<sub>4</sub></fc> is equal to <fc red>t<sub>3</sub></fc> were it not for the fact that consciousness of the tree is different to the engram of the tree in the brain. Moreover as I mention later, the object may already exist in consciousness without having been seen and placed as an engram into the brain. In this example it is a tree but it could be anything. \\ That said there is another objection to <fc red>t<sub>3</sub></fc> and <fc red>t<sub>4</sub></fc> being separate times: <fc red>t<sub>4</sub></fc> exists where there is no time. The coming to consciousness of the tree object occurs in a non-time place, the place of psyche and consciousness. This raises questions about the limitations of the psyche to bring objects to consciousness. I do not know those questions and I think it has something to do with the border between psyche and matter. Perhaps <fc red>t<sub>4</sub></fc> is not a time marker but the event of the tree coming into consciousness. |
| | |
| {{:aker:time_and_space:consciousness_tnt.png?800|}} | {{time_and_space:consciousness_tnt.png?800|}} |
| |
| **Questions**:\\ | **Questions**:\\ |